Re: possible ODBC bug with '-infinity'
От | Andrei Kovalevski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: possible ODBC bug with '-infinity' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 477D0E5F.9040705@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: possible ODBC bug with '-infinity' (Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
Hello, Happy New Year! Richard Broersma Jr wrote: > --- On Mon, 12/3/07, Andrei Kovalevski <andyk@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > >> Are you sure these values are equal? Try this in PgAdmin: >> >> create table t (t timestamp); >> insert into t values ('-infinity'); >> insert into t values ('infinity'); >> insert into t values ('9999-12-31 23:59:59'); >> insert into t values ('5874897-12-31 23:59:59'); >> insert into t values ('5874897-12-31 >> 23:59:59.999999999'); >> --insert into t values ('5874898-01-01 00:00:00'); >> select t::date, t::time, t::timestamp, t::varchar from t; >> > > Now the real question is, "What does and ODBC client do with these value?". > > Also, don't forget to include values for -infinity and other timestamps that are smaller than what the client side applicationcan display. > ODBC supports dates and timestamps as: typedef struct tagTIMESTAMP_STRUCT { SQLSMALLINT year; .......... } TIMESTAMP_STRUCT; So, it can't show dates bigger then 32,767 or smaller then -32,768. I think - correct driver behavour should be: 1) driver returns NULL value for SQL_DATE_STRUCT and SQL_TIMESTAMP_STRUCT 2) function return value should be SQL_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO; 3) driver also sets Informative Description for this error with actual value - if possible. -- Andrei Kovalevski PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: