Re: pstrdup(TextDatumGetCString(foo)) ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pstrdup(TextDatumGetCString(foo)) ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4779.1457582844@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pstrdup(TextDatumGetCString(foo)) ? (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> writes: > I am encountering, here and there, an idiom like > pstrdup(TextDatumGetCString(foo)) > or a pre-8.4 version, > pstrdup(DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(textout, foo))) > It's leading me to question my sanity because it appears to me > that both text_to_cstring (underlying TextDatumGetCString) and > textout already return a string palloc'd in the current context, > and that pstrdup (without any change of context) can't be accomplishing > anything. I'm probably missing something crucial, but what? No, you're right: pstrdup in that context is a useless waste of cycles and memory. A quick grep in the current PG sources shows me only two occurrences of the former, both in the same function and both doubtless introduced by the same misinformed author. I find no occurrences of the latter. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: