Re: SET ROLE and search_path
От | Rob Sargent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SET ROLE and search_path |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47761b8b-d892-943b-1bc9-29bde61a2e62@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SET ROLE and search_path (Patrick FICHE <Patrick.Fiche@aqsacom.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Does your role definition assign a search_path?Hi,
I’m trying to implement a PostgreSQL multi-tenant database that will be accessed by a Web Application.
The users that will login will belong to different companies and a schema was created in the database for each company.
However, I would like the Web Application to connect with a single Postgres login.
Let’s say that I have 2 companies : comp1 and comp2 with their respective schema (comp1 / comp2).
Then, the web application connects with web_app login which has been granted comp1 and comp2 roles….
Depending on the user connecting to the application, I would like to use SET ROLE comp1 / SET ROLE comp2 in order to get access to the relevant data only.
However, it seems that SET ROLE does not change the search_path (which is different for comp1 and comp2).
Is there any way to change the search_path in an easy way (in a procedure) after SET ROLE has been executed.
Am I missing anything with SET ROLE.
When search_path contains “$user”, does it refer to session_user or current_user ?
Thanks for any advice
Patrick
create role comp1;Every re-use of the postgres connection must start by resetting the search_path. I find it easier to log in as comp1. Some jiggery-pokery involved in passwords but no one in company #1 needs to know the user name let alone password.
alter role comp1 set search_path=comp1,base,public;
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: