Re: TypeInfoCache
От | Oliver Jowett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TypeInfoCache |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47736A03.5020009@opencloud.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TypeInfoCache (Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: TypeInfoCache
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Daniel Migowski wrote: > getString on text_col took 8.27384ms > getCharacterStream on text_col took 14.26489ms > Factor: 1.724095462324628 > getString on varchar_col took 9.57153ms > getCharacterStream on varchar_col took 12.76733ms > Factor: 1.3338860140437319 > Conclusion: There is no real performance loss even in the worst case > (which should never occur anyway), so please accept my patch. I wish you > all a happy new year! I'm confused. Don't your numbers show a 30%-70% slowdown when using getCharacterStream()? Also some quick notes about microbenchmarks: - 1000 iterations isn't really enough to get useful numbers, try 20,000+ for JIT effects or considerably more for GC effects - server vs. client JVM can have quite different behaviours, you should check both - put your inner benchmark loops in a separate method as some JIT has method-level granularity - benchmark the same code path in your warmup loop as you actually measure the numbers from. In your code, you're benchmarking a different code path to the one you run in your warmup loop. -O
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: