Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Spoofing as the postmaster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 476ECA7E.10604@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Spoofing as the postmaster (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
Re: Spoofing as the postmaster |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> Am I missing something here, or did you just post >> a piece of configure that *agreed* with what I said? ;-) > > Maybe I misread what you said. I thought you were claiming that mysql > do this more securely than we do; which they don't. But looking back, > >>>> It's certainly the default on my SQL Servers. And Sybase. AFAIK it's the >>>> default on MySQL, > > it seems it's not too clear which case you meant by "it". My bad, then. Probably didn't quote enough :-) My point is that all these other server products have the exact same issue. And that they deal with it the exact same we do - pretty much leave it up to the guy who configure the server to realize that's just how things work. I'm just surprised that people are actually surprised by this. To me, it's just a natural fact that happens to pretty much all systems. And a good reason not to let arbitrary users run processes that can bind to something on your server. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: