Re: BUG #3829: Wrong index reporting from pgAdmin III (v1.8.0 rev 6766-6767)

Tom Lane wrote:
> NikhilS <nikkhils@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Looks like pg_get_indexdef is unwell :-(
> 
>> yes, it was unwell in the area where the amcanorder was being processed. The
>> attached patch should fix this.
> 
> Hm, there is a definitional issue here.  Should pg_get_indexdef print
> this stuff at all when colno is nonzero?  The header comment says that
> it is to return the column's variable or expression only.  The existing
> code suppresses the opclass in this case, which to me suggests that it
> should suppress DESC/ASC as well.  Which is not what Nikhil's patch
> does.
> 
> Dave, I think we put in this variant of the function for pgAdmin ---
> what does pgAdmin need?

More is better for us - it saves an ugly query that will get uglier if
we need to figure out ASC/DESC here too :-)

I agree that we should have all or nothing though, so I'd like to see
ASC/DESC and opclass please.

/D