Re: A new feature patch and a bug fix
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A new feature patch and a bug fix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47669DE1.4070602@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A new feature patch and a bug fix (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: A new feature patch and a bug fix
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >> Let's begin with the bug fix. I've found that I can set the owner of an >> object only from login role. pgAdmin doesn't allow me to set ownership >> to a group. psql allows it, so I think this is a bug. The patch named >> "dlgProperty.patch" fixes this issue. > > OK... but can you really assign ownership to a group as well as a group > role? For example, from: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/sql-altertable.html > > ---- > This form changes the owner of the table, index, sequence, or view to > the specified user. > ---- > > That implies just users to me. > I did it for a group, works great (8.1 and 8.2). Now, I don't really know if this is really a feature or something overlooked. Either pgAdmin is wrong either psql is. >> I found this when I tried to add "reassign owned by" and "drop owned by" >> functionalities to pgAdmin. I first thought I would add this with the >> drop-user code but I prefer to make it available alone. So I used my >> well known way : a new contextual menu (in fact two : "Reassign Owned >> To..." and "Drop Owned"). The first one opens a wxSingleChoiceDialog >> dialog for the user to choose a role from. The second one waits for a >> confirmation and then fires the SQL statement. My problem is here : on a >> user contextual menu, the only connection I can get is the maintenance >> connection. So I will only be able to reassign or drop objects within >> the maintenance database. I was wondering if there was a way to get a >> handle to the last open connection ? or if there was another way ? for >> example asking the user to choose the database to connect to and fire >> the SQL statement ? or asking the user to select a database where he's >> already connected to ? > > Yeah, I think that's going to be the only way - present a list of > databases on the server. Or do it the other way round and add the > functionality to the database object and present a list of roles to > choose from. > I'll take a look at the query tool to see how to do this ("present a list of databases on the server"). Another call to wxSingleChoiceDialod seems a bad way to me... I'll need to add a new dialog, don't you think ? -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: