Re: slow query using sub select
От | Tim Jones |
---|---|
Тема | Re: slow query using sub select |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47668A1334CDBF46927C1A0DFEB223D340EF94@mail.optiosoftware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | slow query using sub select ("Tim Jones" <TJones@optio.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
that worked like a champ nice call as always! thanks Tim Jones Healthcare Project Manager Optio Software, Inc. (770) 576-3555 -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 7:07 PM To: Tim Jones Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] slow query using sub select "Tim Jones" <TJones@optio.com> writes: > I am having a problem with a sub select query being kinda slow. The > query is as follows: > select batterycode, batterydescription, observationdate from Battery > t1 where patientidentifier=611802158 and observationdate = (select > max(observationdate) from Battery t2 where > t2.batterycode=t1.batterycode and patientidentifier=611802158) order by batterydescription. Yeah, this is essentially impossible for the planner to optimize, because it doesn't see any way to de-correlate the subselect, so it does it over again for every row. You might find it works better if you cast the thing as a SELECT DISTINCT ON problem (look at the "weather report" example in the SELECT reference page). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: