Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> I assumed the white paper would have proper attribution.
>
> Right, but is the white paper going to be thorough to mention _all_
> changes?
>
Hmmm good question which gets back to where we started :). My very first
thought on all of this was that we would list all notable changes but
that we wouldn't mention anyone's name.
Then, we would have a "Who contributed to this release" section that
just listed names without attribution to the specific feature. IMO, that
is the only "fair" way.
I realize that notable is subjective.
Here is the deal :). I think as long as a single person is making the
decision as to what goes and stays, there will always be friction.
Perhaps it is time for a "release team"? Odd numbers only, +1/-1 voting
etc... I don't know maybe that is too much.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake