Re: [DOCS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47596FFE.9090903@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib
module documentation?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> Historically, the only way to troubleshoot some of the contrib modules >> was to e-mail the author. If people think that we've reached a standard >> that everything in /contrib is now well-documented and supported by the >> general community, the I suppose we don't need contact information. I'm >> not so sure myself. > > I do not think that we should encourage people to mail the authors first > rather than pgsql-bugs. For one thing, a lot of those addresses are > dead, and some of the ones that aren't don't respond especially fast. > > If the community-at-large can't handle a bug, we certainly have enough > institutional memory to try to contact the original author, even if that > address isn't in the SGML docs. > Perhaps the at a minimum the email goes in the commit? Joshua D. Drake > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: