Re: Vacuum Problem
От | Cedric BUSCHINI |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum Problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 475677BE.5090301@carax.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuum Problem ("Usama Dar" <munir.usama@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum Problem
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Usama Dar a écrit : > > > On Dec 5, 2007 12:53 PM, Cedric BUSCHINI <cbuschini@carax.com > <mailto:cbuschini@carax.com>> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have a problem. The following message keeps appearing in logs : > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WARNING: database "data_base" must be vacuumed within 2606182 > transactions > HINT: To avoid a database shutdown, execute a full-database VACUUM in > "data_base". > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Last week I have run : 'vacuumdb -vz -U postgres -ddata_base' > Today it's still listed in 'ps aux' > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > postgres 2113 1.0 1.9 26256 20132 ? D Nov26 130:14 > postgres: postgres data_base [local] VACUUM > root 2146 0.0 0.1 4616 1508 tty1 Ss Nov28 0:00 > -bash > root 2176 0.0 0.0 4648 996 tty1 S+ Nov28 0:00 > vacuumdb -vz -U postgres -ddata_base > postgres 2177 0.0 0.3 10260 3572 ? S Nov28 7:12 > postgres: postgres data_base [local] VACUUM waiting > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > In pg_stat_activity I can see two lines mentionning 'vacuum > verbose analyze' > > What can I do ?? > I really need help > > > it seems to me that you need to vacuum more frequently, and the hint > seems to point you to a vacuum full for now, try "vacuumdb -avz", but > beaware it can be time & resource consuming. So your advice is to stop the running vacuum and run 'vacuum -avz' ? My actual question is the running processes are doing something or not ?
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: