Re: Dump/Restore Large Object OID
От | Norberto Delle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dump/Restore Large Object OID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4753E744.60709@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dump/Restore Large Object OID ("Gurjeet Singh" <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Gurjeet Singh wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:65937bea0712011949o7c6888bel8c020f21a116756c@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">Why not give it a try once? Dump and restore once and see for yourself. You'd have done that by now, but if you haven't do give it a try instead of waiting any more. You may learn a thing or two in the process... On 11/29/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Norberto Delle <<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:betodelle@gmail.com">betodelle@gmail.com> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi all If I don't use the --oids option when dumping a database with pg_dump, can I assure that the "loid" field of the pg_largeobject table will keep it's value when restoring? Of course, I already done that. I'm using pgAdmin to make database backups\restores, without checking the "With OIDs" option and it works well for the most of the cases. But sometimes referenced large objects are not found after the restore, that's is why I'm asking.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: