Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 474F4001.1010507@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses? (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list
addresses?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Hi all, > > It appears that I caused a ruckus with my suggestion. It hasn't helped that > I have, I think, encouraged a rather different discussion. This message is > intended to disambiguate the various threads of this discussion, lay to rest > at least one, and to make a promise about others. > > A. What I asked for > > What I actually asked for was that we reject mail From: > <listname@postgresql.org> destined for <listname@postgresql.org>. I > suggested this, because the spammers have obviously figured out that they > can send mail with the From: and To: headers the same, and evade many spam > traps. Since lists should _never_ send mail to themselves (it'd be a loop), > this is an obvious optimisation. Marc says he can do this; I dunno whether > it's been done, but I think his suggestion should be implemented. Yes, please do if not done already! > B. What else came out > > As it turns out, this discussion raised several other issues. I think they > are the following: > > 1. SMTP Auth > > Everyone agrees this should be and is happening, so we don't need to discuss > it more. Eh. I think we agree that it should be, but it certainly isn't. But I agree with the not need to discuss anymore. <snip> > Every one of the above may be answered in different ways, and the union of > them entails various listmail policies that we may or may not like. Since > the possible set of policies is so large, I offer to put together a proposed > set of policies, with justifications, some time in January (after the > release is behind us); that ought to eliminate the number of options that > need to be included (I think some of the above questions have obvious > answers). > > Is this ok with others? +1 //Magnus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: