Re: Two fixes for plpgsql.sgml
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two fixes for plpgsql.sgml |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 474D3962.2070709@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two fixes for plpgsql.sgml (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Two fixes for plpgsql.sgml
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Neil Conway a écrit : > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:17 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >> This patch fixes two issues on plpgsql.sgml. > > The first hunk seems like a regression to me: AFAICS the current > phrasing is what is intended. > > *** 133,139 **** > > <para> > <application>PL/pgSQL</> functions can also be declared to return > ! a <quote>set</>, or table, of any data type they can return a > single > instance of. Such a function generates its output by executing > <command>RETURN NEXT</> for each desired element of the result > set, or by using <command>RETURN QUERY</> to output the result of > --- 133,139 ---- > > <para> > <application>PL/pgSQL</> functions can also be declared to return > ! a <quote>set</>, or table, or any data type they can return a > single > instance of. Such a function generates its output by executing > <command>RETURN NEXT</> for each desired element of the result > set, or by using <command>RETURN QUERY</> to output the result of > That's why I said that it needs to be reviewed carefully :) It just means I didn't understand the sentence. Can you explain why the last part is needed ? (the part that starts with "of any data type...") Thanks. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: