Re: change to interfaces.html
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: change to interfaces.html |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 473DBC91.3000409@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: change to interfaces.html ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: change to interfaces.html
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> We do - we prefer the community code over the one produced and >> maintained by a single company, and released under a licence that is >> potentially very restrictive (depending on the interpretation which >> has yet to be tested in court afaik). > > Uhmmm o.k. now I am ticked. Dave you are full of it on this one. The > license chosen is one the most trusted Open Source licenses in existed. > It is the GPL for god sake. I believe Dave is referring to the part about if the "linking" of a driver counts enough to force the application to become GPL or not that hasn't been tested. LGPL conveniently gets around that problem. > And although we are the primary developers of ODBCng we do accept > patches, the source can be downloaded via Anonymous SVN. > > There is no different between ODBC and ODBCng except your ridiculous and > ignorant attitude. > > The real difference between ODBCng and ODBC is that ODBCng is > continually tested, continually developed, and continually improved. Or > is that the part that bothers you? From what I can tell, psqlODBC is also continually developed, though maybe at a different speed. But just looking at the repositories shows latest commit to psqlODBC 12 days ago, and ODBCng 2 months ago... Goes to show you can twist that reasoning either way. But, just for the record. I put psqlODBC on top for three reasons. First, it's claimed to be the official driver. If it should claim to be that or not is a different discussion, that's how it is now, and that's what the page should reflect. Second, the psqlODBC driver is more feature-complete, so it will fit more peoples requirements. ODBCng doesn't support advanced authentication methods. It doesn't support versions < 8.0. Last I checked it didn't support SSL, but maybe that's been fixed? Third, ODBCng is not a production release (according to your own page, I make no statement to the code itself, since I haven't looked at it) //Magnus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: