Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
От | Steve Wampler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4738910B.2070603@noao.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Nov 12, 2007 11:29 AM, Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> wrote: >> You don't need a 32bit kernel to support 8GB of memory should you? As >> long as the kernel supports PAE that should be enough to make use of it. >> You only need a 64bit address space when each process wants to see more >> than ~3GB of RAM. > > There's a performance hit for using PAE. Not sure what it is, but I > recall it being the in the 5 to 10% range. Also, using PAE *used* to require the (OS-internal) use of 'bounce-buffers' to copy data from processes high-up in memory down to i/o devices low-down in memory. I don't know if that's still an issue or not with 2.6 kernels, but I could see it still being the case and, if so, seems like it would have a significant impact on I/O bound tasks (like most DB processing...) -- Steve Wampler -- swampler@noao.edu The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: