Re: Training events policy ... first test case

Joshua D. Drake wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:20071104123014.21e2e19d@scratch" type="cite"><blockquote
type="cite"><blockquotetype="cite"><pre wrap="">Your suggestion implies that instead of doing this publicly a www
 
team cabal should decide this in some back room and not inform
anyone of it.
     </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">You have some proof they're doing anything inappropriate? Confident a
judge would accept it if they sued for damage to their reputation and
loss of potential business by allegations made in a public forum?
   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
Well let's start at the top. Has *anyone* bothered to contact the party
and just talk to them? See what is going on? A lot of this seems it may
be circumspect. </pre></blockquote> Any progress on this?  How about a policy with regard to event posting?  I think at
thevery least something should be done about events that appear to be overzealous in nature (to say the very least). 
<br/><br /> Berkus original post in this thread was with regard to preventing the "flooding" of training listings. 
Whilewe've addressed a "front page" issue, with regard to jockeying for position...I don't think anything has been done
toaddress the flooding issue.<br /><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
 
Chander Ganesan
Open Technology Group, Inc.
One Copley Parkway, Suite 210
Morrisville, NC  27560
Phone: 877-258-8987/919-463-0999
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.otg-nc.com">http://www.otg-nc.com</a>
</pre>