Re: Training events policy ... first test case

Tom Lane wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:5652.1194152441@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Kevin Hunter <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"href="mailto:hunteke@earlham.edu"><hunteke@earlham.edu></a> writes:
</pre><blockquotetype="cite"><pre wrap="">Or perhaps:   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> </pre><blockquote
type="cite"><prewrap="">In the next six months, there are <link>21 events</link> in 4 countries
 
from 13 different companies.   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
+1, especially if the number of companies is noticeably more than
three-or-four. </pre></blockquote> I'm still opposed to event spam..which everyone seems to conveniently ignore when I
bringit up. :-( .<br /><br /> How about trying to limit the number of events that a company can have on the list at a
time? Say a maximum of 5 events listed at a time?  That's fairly even handed, and would force folks to post courses
thatthey would consider would have some likelihood of running?<br /><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
 
Chander Ganesan
Open Technology Group, Inc.
One Copley Parkway, Suite 210
Morrisville, NC  27560
Phone: 877-258-8987/919-463-0999
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.otg-nc.com">http://www.otg-nc.com</a>
</pre>