Re: Wrong directory name for beta2
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wrong directory name for beta2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4729D7BB.2040401@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wrong directory name for beta2 (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
Robert Treat wrote: > On Thursday 01 November 2007 03:09, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> --On Wednesday, October 31, 2007 16:24:16 -0700 Devrim GÜNDÜZ >>> >>> <devrim@CommandPrompt.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Darcy just pointed out that there is a problem with the beta2 directory >>>> name for sources in the FTP sites. For beta1 , we have v8.3beta1, which >>>> is the correct naming, and for beta2, we have v8.3beta . >>>> >>>> I first would just rename the directory, but again Darcy reminded that >>>> the announcement text includes "v8.3beta" directory. We need to symlink >>>> it to beta2 for now, and then create beta3 (or whatever) directory next >>>> time. >>>> >>>> I'll create the symlink later today, unless someone objects. >>> Do not create the symlink, the directory naming wasn't a mistake ... it >>> was named without the trailing # at the request of JoshB, as it >>> simplified pointing ppl to the binaries ... all future beta's will be put >>> into the same directory, with the filenames themselves the only thing >>> that will be changing .. >> There's a big problem here, and that's that we are not consistent. >> Things like that shouldn't just change "at the request of JoshB", it >> should be discussed on the lists to determine all implications first... >> > > hmm... istm i am not getting emails from Marc... *shrug*. > > Just to reiterate (since I brought this up when we released the announcement), > we actually now have 2 different naming schemes; no # for the tarballs, and > with a # for beta binaries. now *that* is silly, so let's get it together for > beta3 eh? > > Personally I go +1 on having the # in the url, and I would also like to see +1 (I'd + more than 1 if I could :-P) > old beta directories removed once the new beta is out (someone looking > in /source directory is bound to think /beta1 came after /beta based on > sorting alone, and is there *any* reason we want people downloading beta1 at > this point?) +1 on that too. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: