Re: module archive
От | Florian G. Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: module archive |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47236900.2030204@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: module archive (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2007 schrieb Andrew Dunstan: >> From time to time people have raised the idea of a CPAN-like mechanism for >> downloading, building and installing extensions and the like (types, >> functions, sample dbs, anything not requiring Postgres itself to be >> rebuilt), and I have been thinking on this for the last few days. What sort >> of requirements would people have of such a mechanism? How do people >> envision it working? > > Downloading, building, and installing extensions is actually fairly > standardized already (well, perhaps there are 2 or 3 standards, but CPAN has > that as well). I think the inhibitions relate more to the management of > what is installed. > > I imagine we need a package manager inside of PostgreSQL to manage > installation, setup, removal, dependencies and so on. Much like rpm or dpkg > really. That should replace the current "run this .sql file" mechanism, > much like rpm and dpkg replaced the "run make install and trust me" > mechanism. I have some of this mapped out in my head if there is interest. The major challenge that I see is getting updates right, especially when the package/module contains tables which the user might have added data to (Like for example pre-8.3 tsearch). Both for updates of the packages, and for upgrading postgres to a new major revision. Maybe there are some schema-versioning tools available already that might help, though... > We'd also need easy integration with the real rpm and dpkg, so that > distribution packages can be built easily and I can run > > apt-get install postgresql extension1 extension2 Wow, that is ambitious ;-) I haven't yet seen a single distribution that gets this right for CPAN, ruby gems, or anything the like - if you know one, I'd be very interested in trying it out. Speaking for myself, I'd already be very happy if I could do apt-get install postgresql postgresql-pkg and then postpkg <database> install <whatever module>. That'd also allow postpkg to deal with the database-specific requirements of a package manager (Like specifying which db to add the module too). regards, Florian Pflug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: