Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47225B7E.5060708@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> I'm leaning towards applying the patch now, and hoping for 2b to happen. > >> I think we should live with the mingw BF breakage for a day or two. The >> patch is clearly an important improvement, but it should be as widely >> tested as possible. > > If Dave is intending to build the Windows installer as soon as beta2 is > wrapped, then I agree with this plan. But my understanding was we'd > missed his window for today and so that wouldn't happen till Monday. > Assuming that's true, the idea Bruce and I had discussed on the phone > was: > > 1. Wrap official beta2 tonight, so that other packagers can work from it > over the weekend; > > 2. Magnus fixes his patch Sunday and applies it then; > > 3. Dave builds the Windows installer Monday *from CVS tip*. > > So the Windows version would be beta2-plus-a-little but we'd neither > hold up work on other platforms nor break anything in buildfarm. > > Just an alternative thought. In any case I agree that we want > Windows testing of beta2 to include this patch. If we do that, then what we label as beta2 in the installer is *not* the same as someone who has built beta2 from source. Can't say I like that one, and I know Dave doesn't like it (he said so before going offline). I'd rather see msvc working and mingw broken for beta2 really, because then we *know* that if someone says they're doing beta2 on mingw they're misinformed... //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: