Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 471EA10C.9080101@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Now to the extent that regular commit-fests keep patch development > more closely aligned with the mainline CVS, the fest proposal might > indirectly alleviate your pain. But I'd think that snaps taken > *after* the fests would be the best for that, as they'd be closer > to what any subsequent development would be based on. The stability > argument I made doesn't seem like a problem for testing purposes, > only if someone were to try to use such a snap for production purposes > (which putting them up for archiving might encourage). > > > It might be worth applying a simple tag (but not a branch) at the end (and maybe also at the start) of each checkpoint/fest/whatever cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: