Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:27:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> There's legitimate use for creating a role with NOLOGIN and a password.
>> If we think that, then we shouldn't have a message at all.
> 
> At least if we think it's more than a very narrow legitimate use, compared
> to the number of ppl making the mistake.
> 
> I agree with making it a NOTICE instead of WARNING though.

Did we ever come to a conclusion on this or not? I've changed my patch
per the suggestions in the thread, but I've held back on committing it
to hear arguments... Go or no-go?

//Magnus