Re: 1.8-Beta5 Bug: sequence properties dialog produces wrong sql statement order
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 1.8-Beta5 Bug: sequence properties dialog produces wrong sql statement order |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4715DF55.2070708@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 1.8-Beta5 Bug: sequence properties dialog produces wrong sql statement order ("Horvath Gabor" <dueyduey@freemail.hu>) |
Список | pgadmin-support |
Horvath Gabor wrote: > On 9/24/07, Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> wrote: >> Horvath Gabor wrote: >>> pgAdminIII v1.8-Beta5 >>> Windows XP >>> PostgreSQL 8.1, linux >>> >>> I tried to adjust the Minimum value in the properties dialog of a sequence. >>> I wanted to adjust the range so that the present current value would >>> have fallen out of it, so I changed the current value too. >>> ...In vain, because the SQL batch composed by the dialog shows that >>> the ALTER SEQUENCE ... MINVALUE .... statement comes first, and the >>> SELECT setval(....) comes only after that. >>> As expected, an error message popped up saying the minimum can't be >>> higher than the current value when I pressed OK. >> Thanks, fixed in SVN. > > Thanks! > I tried it in v1.8.0 RC1. Now the two statements are in reverse order > (setval first, then alter sequence), but it is still not working right > for the cases I sketched as follows: > > Minvalue: 1 --> 100 > Current value: 5 --> 500 > Maxvalue: 10 --> 900 > > In this case, we need three SQL statements: > alter sequence my_seq maxvalue 900; > select setval('my_schema.my_seq', 500, true); > alter sequence my_seq minvalue 100; > > I guess the general ordering of the statements should be as follows: > 1 Any ALTER SEQUENCE MIN/MAXVALUE statements that widen the range > 2 SETVAL > 3 Any ALTER SEQUENCE MIN/MAXVALUE statements that narrow the range. thanks, fixed in SVN. Regards, Dave
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: