Re: Approval process for news/events/training is broken
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Approval process for news/events/training is broken |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4713ED94.2060505@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Approval process for news/events/training is broken (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-www |
Folks, >>> The real question is, "is it proprietary". If it is even partially >>> closed source then it really doesn't belong in the "postgresql family >>> product" unless we also include MPP and Replicator. >> You know what I mean :-). And all of EDB-Postgres is open source, >> including the funky little MySQL migrator tool in the latest builds. > > Uh, doesn't the installer use a commercial product that isn't open > source? Does requiring non-open source tools to build something make it > non-open source? Postgres requires a C compiler that can be open or > closed source so I don't know if that helps clarify things. I don't think any of this is relevant for the News page. The question is, will the person sending me the press release be a paid PR person, or an OSS developer? We treat the two differently because they're going to send us different sorts of news at different intervals. For example, I would treat EDB-Postgres as "commercial" because they send us formal press releases every 3 weeks, which often need significant re-writing to target our developers. On the other hand, if we get anything from OpenRPT it's just a release announcement, maybe once a year, so we can treat them like an "PostgreSQL Family" OSS project. So it's not commercial vs. open source *product*, it's commercial vs. open source *news*. --Josh Berkus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: