Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my)
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47139B7C.1020908@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>>>> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 01:53:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>>> I am thinking that Dave's discovery explains some previously unsolved >>>>> bug reports, such as >>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-05/msg00260.php >> ... >> And given that, do we even nede to special-case lc_ctype_is_c() at all? If >> we never pass in a .65001 locale (which we don't, because it fails)? > > Hmm. If it doesn't need a special case, then we still lack an > explanation for the aforementioned bug report. From what I can tell that report doesn't tell us very much - we don't know server encoding, we don't know server locale, we don't even know client encoding. So I don't think we know anywhere *near* enough to say it's related to this. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: