Re: Concerns about this release
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Concerns about this release |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4713.1008805947@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Concerns about this release ("Mitch Vincent" <mitch@doot.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Mitch Vincent" <mitch@doot.org> writes: > So if anyone doesn't mind to take a minute, could I get opinions? Is it too > paranoid to not use the 7.2 release in production? Don is working from the "don't be a pioneer" theory, which is hard to dispute in the abstract. In the concrete, though, I see little reason to think that 7.2 will be less reliable than 7.1.*, even before we fix the inevitable early-return bugs and issue a 7.2.1. We have not made any huge changes like WAL in this cycle. As an idle exercise, I just went through the CVS log entries since 7.2beta2 (Nov 6, about six weeks ago). I counted 68 log entries that I could classify as bug fixes; of these, 47 were for bugs that exist in 7.1, the other 21 for new bugs introduced in 7.2 code. I'd call about 4 of the old bugs and 6 of the new ones significant issues (eg, a core dump is significant, fixing to_char's handling of roman numeral dates is not). 4 out of the 6 significant new-bug fixes were in the first two weeks of the six-week period. You can read those numbers however you want, but to me they look like 7.2.0 will be better than 7.1.anything. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: