Re: Vacuums on large busy databases
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuums on large busy databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 470FED70-B3BA-4B6C-A6B1-DFD8882746B2@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuums on large busy databases (Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Francisco On 14-Sep-06, at 1:36 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Dave Cramer writes: > >> What is effective_cache set to ? > > Increasing this seems to have helped significantly a web app. Load > times seem magnitudes faster. > > Increased it to effective_cache_size = 12288 # 96MB > > What is a reasonable number? > I estimate I have at least 1 to 2 GB free of memory. You are using 6G of memory for something else ? effective cache should be set to 75% of free memory > > Don't want to get too carried away right now with too many > changes.. because right now we have very few connections to that > database (usually less than 10), but I expect it to go to a norm of > 20+.. so need to make sure I won't make changes that will be a > problem in that scenario. > > So far only see one setting that can be an issue: work_mem so have > it set to only 32768. > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: