Re: Preliminary GSSAPI Patches
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 470D118D.50300@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Preliminary GSSAPI Patches (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Preliminary GSSAPI Patches
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Henry B. Hotz" <hbhotz@oxy.edu> writes: >> You know, I don't know what I was thinking when I sent this. My >> apologies for the late correction. >> >> Anyone who has a copy of the "host" keys for a machine can >> manufacture kerberos tickets for the "host" service on that machine >> masquerading as absolutely anyone (including people who don't >> exist). Same for the "postgres" keys, and if the postgres server can >> steal the host keys (or vice versa) then it's even worse. >> [snip...] > > Maybe I'm too dense, but I don't see a conclusion here. Do we need to > change our code, our docs, both, or neither? I don't think we do. If you use service keys per our documentation, you should be fine. And if someone owns your host keys, you lost already. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: