Re: dynamic-static date once again

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: dynamic-static date once again
Дата
Msg-id 4702.1000735899@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: dynamic-static date once again  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
>> I think we have agreed that 'current' is a Bad Idea and should be
>> eliminated from the date/time datatypes...

> I've started purging it from the timestamp code I'm working on for 7.2.

Oh good.  Let's not forget to review the pg_proc entries after that
happens, to see which ones can safely be marked cachable.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: