Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47012AC5.9040808@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PG on NFS may be just a bad idea (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, > Maybe we need to actively discourage people from running Postgres > against NFS-mounted data directories. Shane Kerr's paper cited above > mentions some other rather scary properties, including O_EXCL file > creation not really working properly. Wouldn't you be describing a Linux-specific issue, though? And possibly kernel-specific? It's hard to reconcile this with the real-world performance of PostgreSQL on NFS, which is happening all over the place. Most notably, Joe Conway's 20,000 txn/sec. I *do* think it's an accurate statement that if you're going to use Postgres, or any other OLTP database, on NFS you'd better have access to a NAS expert. But to say that it's a bad idea even if you have expert help is probably going to far. --Josh Berkus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: