Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
От | Stefan Kaltenbrunner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46FFEA66.4040408@kaltenbrunner.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes: >> So a total of: 16 minutes for 8.2 compared to 53 minutes for 8.3 to >> have the database in the same state. > > Please try that experiment with all three configurations on both > versions: > * autovacuum off > * autovacuum on, autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 0 > * autovacuum on, autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20 > Comparing apples and oranges isn't real helpful in determining > what's happening. for the record I'm seeing similiar dramatic slowdowns(ie takes a few additional hours) during restoration of a 120GB database here - with the default autovacuum settings the restore is taking ages to go through the ALTER TABLE foo ADD PRIMARY KEY bar steps because autovacuum is analyzing those tables at a very slow rate (ie the box is more or less idle and the ALTER TABLE is waiting for the lock). I have not yet experimented with different autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay settings but this seems like a step backwards :-( Stefan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: