-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I was just talking with one of my developers (Alexey) and he said, why
not just use Pg. Which is an interesting point. Consider that Volkswagen
is properly known as Volkswagen but commonly (and most of the time)
referred to as VW.
Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre junk and
just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.
Heck, I know plenty of people that just say PG, or PGSQL, myself included.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG+9zMATb/zqfZUUQRAg+ZAKCNgntEJI/3PoO2HRbD+ZzRaP+CEwCcCBQ4
M0AC6Zy+j4twXe+hd/r5NIA=
=KpGa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----