Re: Change request ...
От | Lukas Kahwe Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Change request ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46FB82BC.2030906@pooteeweet.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Change request ... (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Change request ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:48:52PM +0530, Anoo Sivadasan Pillai wrote: >> Description : I have two tables with the same data , While I issue an >> update command to increment the value of a unique field by 1, the >> statement fails in one table and will succeed in the other table. >> Following is the script to reproduce the behaviour. > > Correct. Unique constraints are not deferrable. I'm sure there are > people who would like it fixed, but there is currently not even a > proposal on how to do it. It's a hard problem, for which there are > well-known work-arounds. In practice this problem don't come up too > often. > > It's been on the TODO list for at least 5 years... Wow, I was not aware of this limitation. MySQL hacks around this issue by allowing an ORDER BY in UPDATE (and DELETE) statements. regards, Lukas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: