Re: top for postgresql (ptop?)
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: top for postgresql (ptop?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46FB11BD.6060200@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: top for postgresql (ptop?) ("Mark Wong" <markwkm@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: top for postgresql (ptop?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Wong wrote: > On 9/25/07, Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus@nttdata.co.jp> wrote: >> Mark, >> >> Very interesting. I'm looking for such tool. >> >> Unfortunately, I can't compile it on my Solaris right now, >> but I hope it will be shipped with PostgreSQL distribution. > > I haven't tried it on Solaris but I'm not surprised. If I can get my > hands on a Solaris system I can probably get it to work. :) The code > for getting the process information is platform specific and I know > I've broken it for all the platforms I haven't tried it on... Mark, I tested it on Solaris and I found two problems there. One is with configure. It does not correctly handled CPPFLAGS. Generated makefile ignore path to the include files. This line is wrong: # explicit dependency for the module appropriate to this machine m_sunos5.o: $(srcdir)/machine/m_sunos5.c$(COMPILE) -o $@ -c $(srcdir)/machine/m_sunos5.c Second issue is with new interface of get_process_info function. Currently it has 4 arguments but in m_sunos5.c is defined only with 3 arguments. Last issue is with -m64 switch. Solaris pg installation does not have 64bit libpg (will be soon) and linker is not able put everything together. Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: