Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46F92CDB.5010909@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3 (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> We previously discussed compressing the numeric data type for small >>> values: >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00715.php >> >>> We didn't do this for 8.3 but in any case Tom did suggest we ought >>> to reverse >>> the weight and sign/dscale so we could do this sometime without >>> introducing >>> another incompatibility. >> >> I had forgotten about that, but it does seem like a good idea to do >> it now. >> Any objections? > > For in-place upgrade purpose It would be good change also OID for > numeric type and preserve current OID for current implementation on > updated system. > > > If we want to get into that game we need a better way of allocating Oids. Right now anything not currently used is liable to be grabbed, so there's a high risk of reuse. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: