Re: For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46EF5ED0.6020808@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER ("Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER
Re: For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER |
Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Phoenix Kiula wrote: > The manual is vague. Several threads about this, in language that is > ambiguous to me. > > So a YES/NO question: > > Q: To get rid of index bloat, is a VACUUM ANALYZE enough? Or must I > reindex/cluster indexes? If you overrun your max_fsm_pages, no: else yes; Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Thanks. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG717QATb/zqfZUUQRAh6uAJ9CGXbA2BxXvMbSZP9Gv8gI9QBkXgCePhqe 6aS3fp60g7YrWECspTVcxyE= =u2o/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: