Re: Cannot declare record members NOT NULL
От | Osvaldo Rosario Kussama |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cannot declare record members NOT NULL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46E85361.3000703@yahoo.com.br обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Cannot declare record members NOT NULL (Cultural Sublimation <cultural_sublimation@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cannot declare record members NOT NULL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Cultural Sublimation escreveu: > Hi, > > I am not sure if this qualifies as a bug report or a feature request, > but I don't see any way to tell Postgresql that the members of a record > cannot be NULL. This causes all kinds of problems when this record > is used to declare the return type of a function. Suppose I had the > following table: (note that all columns are NOT NULL) > > CREATE TABLE movies > ( > movie_id int4 UNIQUE NOT NULL, > movie_name text NOT NULL, > PRIMARY KEY (movie_id) > ); > > > Suppose also that I didn't want the clients to query the table directly, > but instead they have to go through a function "get_movies" which returned > a record of type "get_movies_t": > > CREATE TYPE get_movies_t AS > ( > movie_id int4, > movie_name text > ); > > > CREATE FUNCTION get_movies () > RETURNS SETOF get_movies_t > LANGUAGE sql STABLE > AS > $$ > SELECT movie_id, movie_name FROM movies; > $$; > > > The problem is that Postgresql tells the client that the function returns > two columns, both of which can be NULL, and this makes a mess on the > client side. Is there anyway I can tell Postgresql that the columns of > get_movies_t are NOT NULL? > > If this is (yet another) defect in the SQL standard, can someone suggest > an alternative that would get around it? > CREATE FUNCTION get_movies () RETURNS SETOF get_movies_t LANGUAGE sql STABLE AS $$ SELECT movie_id, movie_name FROM movies WHERE movie_id NOT NULL AND movie_name NOT NULL; $$ Osvaldo
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: