Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best
От | Ron Johnson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46E6C684.9090006@cox.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best ("Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best
|
Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/07 11:26, Phoenix Kiula wrote: > Thanks Greg. > > >> You're not going to get a particularly useful answer here without giving >> some specifics about the two disk controllers you're comparing, how much >> cache they have, and whether they include a battery backup. >> [snip] > > > Would appreciate any tips. From these two, Scenario 1 looks marginally > better to me. I am requesting further information about cache and > battery powered backup, but would appreciate first-off thoughts based > on above info. How (on average) large are the records you need to insert, and how evenly spread across the 24 hour day do the inserts occur? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG5saES9HxQb37XmcRAjZnAKCrPnIyuhuXm+InFpmn/bDiw/1xKgCg7xoC pq4xdQ72BT4qFVqvy2g5RrM= =EbRU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: