Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?

Kris Jurka wrote:

> This is the consensus I'd like to see built before we spend a lot of
> time on something.  Heikki doesn't believe we should do this at all as
> it is covered by DBCP and app server pools.  You clearly believe we need
> this and I'm sort of on the fence (I recall that's where Oliver is as
> well, but I don't claim to speak for him).

I think it belongs outside the driver, but I could be convinced
otherwise if Dave etc. presents a good technical argument as to why it
is easier to implement within the driver. Haven't seen that yet.

-O