Re: Database owner can't analyze/vacuum all of the database tables
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Database owner can't analyze/vacuum all of the database tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46DDB879.80403@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Database owner can't analyze/vacuum all of the database tables ("Yonatan Ben-Nes" <yonatan@epoch.co.il>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Yonatan Ben-Nes wrote: > Hi all, > > When I try to analyze (or vacuum) the database with the owner of the > database I receive the following warnings: > WARNING: skipping "pg_authid" --- only table or database owner can analyze ... > WARNING: skipping "pg_auth_members" --- only table or database owner can > I checked at the documentation and found that those tables are shared across > all of the databases of the cluster. > > So my question is, is it important to analyze/vacuum them? or maybe because > they are scarcely used (I don't even know if this assumption is right) it's > not important to analyze/vacuum them? You'll need to vacuum often enough to prevent transaction wraparound. You might need to vacuum reasonably often if you create & drop a lot of system objects (databases/users etc) and end up with bloated tables. > I can always change their owner to the database owner but I guess that if > the database owner didn't get ownership over those tables too then there is > a reason for that... Don't know if you could have a user other than postgres owning them. Not sure anyone's tried. I think most people schedule their vacuum/autovacuum to run as "postgres" anyway - particularly if they have more than one database in an installation. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: