Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46DA114A.70607@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) ("Liam O'Duibhir" <liamod@fast.fujitsu.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 9/1/2007 7:02 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > PostgreSQL is the *formal name*, while Postgres is the *trade name* ... call it > whichever you want, people will know what you are talking about ... get over it. I could get over it, if this topic as well as the ugly Postgre sh*t it causes as a side effect would ever stop popping up. But it seems to me however often we "get over it", the problem only submerges to pop up again for the next release. Could it be that "getting over it" is kinda like playing ostrich - AGAIN, and that the numerous times we "got over it" only made the situation worse by reinforcing a mistake made long ago? I suggest we someday stop "getting over it" and instead "get done with it". Because rest assured, otherwise it'll be back again ... and again. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: