Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Дата
Msg-id 46D8738B.9080307@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
Ron Mayer wrote:
> Decibel! wrote:

>
>> Someone mentioned companies that are already using Postgres instead of
>> PostgreSQL. I think it says something that the last 3 companies that
>> have started up with PostgreSQL

Yes it says they want their own brand and has zero relevance to this
discussion.

 (Greenplum, Pervasive, EnterpriseDB)
>> have shunned the name. Heck, Greenplum and EnterpriseDB have shunned the
>> name multiple times (names that don't contain PostgreSQL but could:
>> Greenplum, MPP, Bizgres, EnterpriseDB, EnterpriseDB Advanced Server,
>> EnterpriseDB Postgres). Oh, I forgot ExtenDB, too.

See above.

Joshua D. Drake


>
> And "Red Hat Database"
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
>


В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron Mayer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Следующее
От: "Gavin M. Roy"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)