Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46D8738B.9080307@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Ron Mayer wrote: > Decibel! wrote: > >> Someone mentioned companies that are already using Postgres instead of >> PostgreSQL. I think it says something that the last 3 companies that >> have started up with PostgreSQL Yes it says they want their own brand and has zero relevance to this discussion. (Greenplum, Pervasive, EnterpriseDB) >> have shunned the name. Heck, Greenplum and EnterpriseDB have shunned the >> name multiple times (names that don't contain PostgreSQL but could: >> Greenplum, MPP, Bizgres, EnterpriseDB, EnterpriseDB Advanced Server, >> EnterpriseDB Postgres). Oh, I forgot ExtenDB, too. See above. Joshua D. Drake > > And "Red Hat Database" > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: