Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
От | Pallav Kalva |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46D83C50.3040409@livedatagroup.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote: > Pallav Kalva <pkalva@livedatagroup.com> writes: > >> We turned on autovacuums on 8.2 and we have a database which is read >> only , it is basically a USPS database used only for address lookups >> (only SELECTS, no updates/deletes/inserts). >> > > >> This database has about 10gig data and yesterday autovacuum started >> on this database and all of a sudden I see lot of archive logs generated >> during this time, I guess it might have generated close to 3-4gig data >> during this period. >> > > Probably represents freezing of old tuples, which is a WAL-logged > operation as of 8.2. Is it likely that the data is 200M transactions > old? > If nothing changed on these tables how can it freeze old tuples ? Does it mean that once it reaches 200M transactions it will do the same thing all over again ? If I am doing just SELECTS on these tables ? how can there be any transactions ? or SELECTS considered transactions too ? > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: