Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let me ask a question, how many people who are against a name change now

> The bottom line is that the pronunciation/marketing problem with the
> name "PostgreSQL" is not going to change --- it is only going to get
> worse.

I am against the name change and I do not agree with your assessment. I
believe it will get better. As the only real problem is the initial
understanding and pronunciation. The rest is muscle memory.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
            UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1x4AATb/zqfZUUQRAiAaAJsFuoXcsNtTfKeI39izYoGmrlNBMwCfY6D9
cBTJB1WtslvmV0sgF7KEfdI=
=WLlk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----