Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46D5BA93.5060801@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online
Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> If we go ahead with this, I'll commit to doing a contrib README >> cleanup so the doc system works better. >> > > Why wouldn't we just remove the README files altogether? I can't > see maintaining duplicate sets of documentation. > > > Right. Also, let's recall what has previously been discussed for contrib, namely that we break it out into standard modules (think Perl standard modules) and other tools, and that we abandon the wholly misleading "contrib" name altogether. I really want to see that happen next release. Getting the modules properly documented is a very important milestone along the way to getting that done. Maybe then the modules will be considered more first class citizens (until the buildfarm came along they were often hardly tested at all). cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: