Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
От | Brian Hurt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46D46ED3.6070001@janestcapital.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I'm -1 as well, although I'm mainly a "those who have to do the work get to decide if, when, and how the work gets done". I.e. that only the project maintainers should get to vote.
Brian
Joshua D. Drake wrote:Hello, Before anyone goes down this path too far it is very important that I disclose (as I have on multiple occasions before) that Command Prompt owns the name Postgres, Inc (and domains postgresinc.com/net/org). Although we do not have intention to immediately change our name, I will note that if the project changes its name, it increases the possibility that we may do so.First, thanks for letting us know this before people get too settled on something :) At least those of us who missed it last time(s)... Second, this makes my own vote much easier: a clear -1 on the change (unless cmd would be donating that name+domains to the pg fund or something, but given that you didn't suggest that I don't expect that to happen)
I'm -1 as well, although I'm mainly a "those who have to do the work get to decide if, when, and how the work gets done". I.e. that only the project maintainers should get to vote.
Brian
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: