Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46D46CB3.9030303@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) ("Derek Rodner" <derek.rodner@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Before anyone goes down this path too far it is very important that I disclose (as I have on multiple occasions before) that Command Prompt owns the name Postgres, Inc (and domains postgresinc.com/net/org). Although we do not have intention to immediately change our name, I will note that if the project changes its name, it increases the possibility that we may do so. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG1GyzATb/zqfZUUQRAsSTAJ9tO9G8mXmmVjyxEEih5FWVQqrm4ACffgs8 rZ2ljARoGxKVigtndKJnCps= =om6H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: