Re: Hijack!
| От | Steve Atkins |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hijack! |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46D42AF4-21C7-42C6-ADDB-FF765E84F18B@blighty.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Hijack! (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> writes: >> In the business world it's common to top-post and not cut previous >> content >> - and often appropriate, as it tends to be a communication between a >> smaller number of people, and the uncut content provides context for >> future reference. > >> Those who rant about anyone who top posts, or state that you should >> never top-post are mostly clueless or arrogant, or are making over- >> broad >> generalizations. > > Sure, there are contexts where that makes sense. On the PostgreSQL > lists, however, you are writing for the archives as much as for the > immediate readers (and if you don't understand that, *that* is the > first > thing you need to learn). The in-line, trimmed-quotations style is a > lot easier to read when looking through a thread in the archives. > Another advantage is that trimming quoted text reduces the number of > useless matches when searching the archives. Which is pretty much what I said in the relevant context you removed. The risk of removing the wrong context is that it makes it look like we're disagreeing. :) > In short: this is the community consensus on how to post, there are > good reasons for it, and we need to try to educate newbies in it. > Not just say "it's okay to ignore the conventions". Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: