Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> . . .yes. And I don't think that's a bad thing: auditing, if it's
> needed, should be designed into an application, not something that
> you hang on the side.
I disagree. Auditing should ideally be done by a different system and be
implemented by someone else than the original developers. Also with the
many OSS apps out there it would require essentially a fork to add auditing.
regards,
Lukas